Skip to main content

Category & sub-category combo boxes

I was asked the other week how I'd implement a view-model that binds to two combo boxes in the view, where a selection in one affects the other. I've called it category & sub-category combo boxes but I guess it could also be called parent-child combo boxes.

Now I don't perceive this as particularly complex to do, but I was asked how would I do it?

Would I use two seperate lists and how would I avoid stack overflow exceptions when raising property changed events.

The UI looks like this:
The categories are represented by the top combo box:
The sub categories are represented by the bottom combo box:
You should be able to infer from the screen shots that each category has a set of sub-categories, the only special category is All - when selected then all sub categories are displayed, as shown above.

So when Category A is selected then only the related sub-categories should be displayed:
I used a dictionary &  linq to achieve the behaviour required, I avoided using two separate lists. The constructor & class parameters are shown below. As you can see there are only 2 parameters - one for the selected category and the other for the selected sub-category:
The example data pumped into the view-model looks as follows:
I've host the code on sky-drive but I've highlighted the properties on the view-model below starting with the simplest the Categories property. As you can see this is very simple:
It starts to get interesting with the SelectedCategory property, when the property is being set it clears the selected sub-category if the currently selected sub-category is not part of the selected category and then always notifies the of changes to the SubCategories & SelectedSubCategory properties:
The SubCategories property is either a linq if the selected category is either All or empty\null, or just the value from the dictionary:
The final property is SelectedSubCategory, simply if the selected category is All then do nothing else if the selected category does not contain the selected sub-category then find the one that does:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Implementing a busy indicator using a visual overlay in MVVM

This is a technique we use at work to lock the UI whilst some long running process is happening - preventing the user clicking on stuff whilst it's retrieving or rendering data. Now we could have done this by launching a child dialog window but that feels rather out of date and clumsy, we wanted a more modern pattern similar to the way <div> overlays are done on the web. Imagine we have the following simple WPF app and when 'Click' is pressed a busy waiting overlay is shown for the duration entered into the text box. What I'm interested in here is not the actual UI element of the busy indicator but how I go about getting this to show & hide from when using MVVM. The actual UI elements are the standard Busy Indicator coming from the WPF Toolkit : The XAML behind this window is very simple, the important part is the ViewHost. As you can see the ViewHost uses a ContentPresenter element which is bound to the view model, IMainViewModel, it contains 3 child v

Showing a message box from a ViewModel in MVVM

I was doing a code review with a client last week for a WPF app using MVVM and they asked ' How can I show a message from the ViewModel? '. What follows is how I would (and have) solved the problem in the past. When I hear the words ' show a message... ' I instantly think you mean show a transient modal message box that requires the user input before continuing ' with something else ' - once the user has interacted with the message box it will disappear. The following solution only applies to this scenario. The first solution is the easiest but is very wrong from a separation perspective. It violates the ideas behind the Model-View-Controller pattern because it places View concerns inside the ViewModel - the ViewModel now knows about the type of the View and specifically it knows how to show a message box window: The second approach addresses this concern by introducing the idea of messaging\events between the ViewModel and the View. In the example below

Custom AuthorizationHandler for SignalR Hubs

How to implement IAuthorizationRequirement for SignalR in Asp.Net Core v5.0 Been battling this for a couple of days, and eventually ended up raising an issue on Asp.Net Core gitHub  to find the answer. Wanting to do some custom authorization on a SignalR Hub when the client makes a connection (Hub is created) and when an endpoint (Hub method) is called:  I was assuming I could use the same Policy for both class & method attributes, but it ain't so - not because you can't, because you need the signatures to be different. Method implementation has a resource type of HubInnovationContext: I assumed class implementation would have a resource type of HubConnectionContext - client connects etc... This isn't the case, it's infact of type DefaultHttpContext . For me I don't even need that, it can be removed completely  from the inheritence signature and override implementation. Only other thing to note, and this could be a biggy, is the ordering of the statements in th