Skip to main content

CallerMemberName not that great for INotifyPropertyChanged

I've blogged before about the perf improvements of using the CallerMemberName attribute over an expression tree to avoid using hard-coded property strings names when firing the PropertyChanged event on INotifyPropertyChanged.

This works great for the majority simple cases.

Setting the property & notifying:
 or just notifying:
The problem is when it's not the simple case - when setting a property on a view model and wanting to force the updating of another property (on the view model) it doesn't work obviously.
At this point I'm thinking I'll go back to the expression tree approach.


  1. A solution I'm trying out at the moment uses two parameters for the RaisePropertyChanged method:

    protected void RaisePropertyChanged(string property = null, [CallerMemberName]string caller = "")
    var handler = PropertyChanged;
    if (handler != null)
    handler(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(property ?? caller));

    With this implementation a call to "RaisePropertyChanged()" will raise the event with the caller name, while "RaisePropertyChanged("Message")" will raise it with "Message" as the property name, regardless of where it's called from.

  2. Huh? A single parameter is enough. [CallerMemberName] only changes the default value when you don't pass anything.

    protected void RaisePropertyChanged([CallerMemberName] string propertyName = "")

    RaisePropertyChanged(); in a setter will pass the current property name.
    RaisePropertyChanged("RelatedProperty"); anywhere will always pass "RelatedProperty".

    Your code looks wrong. It isn't sufficient to simply call the PropertyChanged(...) event. There are additional checks.

  3. Consider a different approach altogether...
    (as detailed here

    Instead of having your SubCategories property be a simple getter that needs notified to "refresh", have all your properties be a simple get/set using the SetProperty method, but with a slight change.

    Add two additional parameters, onChanged, and onChanging (or just onChanged if you don't need the onChanging handler)

    SetProperty( ref T currentValue, T newValue, [CallerMemberName]string propertyName = "", Action onChanged = null, Action onChanging = null)

    ( In the SetProperty code you will need to call onChanged if it is not null and the property is changing )

    Now your SubCategories property becomes this:

    public IEnumerable SubCategories
    get { return _subCategories; }
    set { SetProperty(ref _subCategories, value);

    your SelectedCategory property this:

    public string SelectedCategory
    get{ return _selectedCategory; }
    set { SetProperty(ref _selectedCategory, value, onChanged:OnSelectedCategoryChanged);}

    And you have an OnChanged handler that does all the work.
    When SelectedCategory is set, this will be called and it will in turn update your SubCategories property.

    private void OnSelectedCategoryChanged()
    if(_selectedCategory == _categories.Keys.First() || string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(_selectedCategory))
    SubCategories = _categories.SelectMany(c=>c.Value);

    SubCategories = _categories[_selectedCategory];

    Now you don't need to worry about manually raising the property changed notification for the SubCategories property, you set the SubCategories property from the OnChanged handler, which will in turn do the notify for you.

    If you follow this approach everywhere, you'll find that your property declarations become exactly what they are, boilerplate code. You can just create templates/snippets to create them and then wrap them in a region and never look at them again. You will never really need to manually call OnPropertyChanged again.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

WPF tips & tricks: Dispatcher thread performance

Not blogged for an age, and I received an email last week which provoked me back to life. It was a job spec for a WPF contract where they want help sorting out the performance of their app especially around grids and tabular data. I thought I'd shared some tips & tricks I've picked up along the way, these aren't probably going to solve any issues you might be having directly, but they might point you in the right direction when trying to find and resolve performance issues with a WPF app. First off, performance is something you shouldn't try and improve without evidence, and this means having evidence proving you've improved the performance - before & after metrics for example. Without this you're basically pissing into the wind, which can be fun from a developer point of view but bad for a project :) So, what do I mean by ' Dispatcher thread performance '? The 'dispatcher thread' or the 'UI thread' is probably the most

Showing a message box from a ViewModel in MVVM

I was doing a code review with a client last week for a WPF app using MVVM and they asked ' How can I show a message from the ViewModel? '. What follows is how I would (and have) solved the problem in the past. When I hear the words ' show a message... ' I instantly think you mean show a transient modal message box that requires the user input before continuing ' with something else ' - once the user has interacted with the message box it will disappear. The following solution only applies to this scenario. The first solution is the easiest but is very wrong from a separation perspective. It violates the ideas behind the Model-View-Controller pattern because it places View concerns inside the ViewModel - the ViewModel now knows about the type of the View and specifically it knows how to show a message box window: The second approach addresses this concern by introducing the idea of messaging\events between the ViewModel and the View. In the example below

Implementing a busy indicator using a visual overlay in MVVM

This is a technique we use at work to lock the UI whilst some long running process is happening - preventing the user clicking on stuff whilst it's retrieving or rendering data. Now we could have done this by launching a child dialog window but that feels rather out of date and clumsy, we wanted a more modern pattern similar to the way <div> overlays are done on the web. Imagine we have the following simple WPF app and when 'Click' is pressed a busy waiting overlay is shown for the duration entered into the text box. What I'm interested in here is not the actual UI element of the busy indicator but how I go about getting this to show & hide from when using MVVM. The actual UI elements are the standard Busy Indicator coming from the WPF Toolkit : The XAML behind this window is very simple, the important part is the ViewHost. As you can see the ViewHost uses a ContentPresenter element which is bound to the view model, IMainViewModel, it contains 3 child v